z12hdvbqirn3vbr1r23usrkw1mreuxv2o
Kingsley Idehen Kingsley Idehen 112399767740508618350
Aug 25, 2011 Aug 25, 2011 Google+
Reshared post from Danny Ayers Distributed Hungarian Notation doesn't Work +Mark Nottingham on...
z12mxfsoipqfuhkgs04cergoasavgxijjhs Reshared post from Danny Ayers
Distributed Hungarian Notation doesn't Work
+Mark Nottingham on HTML5 “web+” URI scheme prefix to sandbox off a set of identifiers for Web apps.

I've missed whatever discussion there was on why such a thing might be remotely desirable (to me "web" implies HTTP, and we already have a scheme for that), but whatever, Mark's post is a good read for anyone who might have to name stuff.

Hope I'm not too cynical is saying the following paragraph could be repeated in a lot of other contexts:
Yes, I’m looking at you, browser folks. Good on you for moving first and winning the land grab, now let’s make sure we don’t all have to live with a mess for the next 30 years.

I'd completely forgotten about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_notation though I vaguely remembering using it for some job or other a long time ago. It was obviously conceived with good intentions, and sometime such conventions can be a really good idea - e.g. the informal RDF term naming convention of lower case initial + camelCase for properties and upper case + camelCase initial for classes works well. But somehow Hungarian Notation just winds up ugly and/or confusing. ClassPerson - bleah!

http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/08/24/distributed_hungarian_notation_doesnt_work
http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/article mnot’s blog: Distributed Hungarian Notation doesn't Work