OpenLink Software

Not logged in : Login

About: Mike Elgan Comment 3     Permalink

an Entity references as follows:

Let's talk about the Twitter comparison. Google+ engagement looks at one minor number: public posts. Private posts (the default mode) are NOT counted. Comments, which are replies, are NOT counted. Twitter engagement numbers count public posts, too (unlike on G+, the vast majority of Twitter posts are public). And replies to tweets -- the equivalent of a comment on Google+ -- are counted, too. A post with 20 replies on Google+ is counted as one post. A post with 20 replies on Twitter is counted as 21 posts. Twitter gets more than 20 times more "credit" in this example for engagement than Google+ does for the EXACT same conversation. That's why Twitter numbers are similar to Google+ numbers when in Face Google+ engagement is probably many times higher than Twitter.

QRcode icon
QRcode image
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139

Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | iSPARQL | ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] This material is Open Knowledge Creative Commons License Valid XHTML + RDFa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 11 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (7 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software